Discuss the weaknesses of the conventional doctrines of strategic management.
Such media accounts typify massive inconsistencies between model assumptions –
openness, competition, transparency, executive responsibility, and low risk – and the reality
of decision premises, a form of hypocrisy between mission goals and actual behaviour. Most
theories of strategic decision-making apply premises and assumptions of rational behaviour
and stable systems. In finance and the world of banking, actual strategic behaviour differs
wildly from the rational model of perfect competition, where all the variables are known,
where information is free and available, and where computation of strategic choices and
their consequences are examined in minute detail. Indeed, the real world of corporate
finance is the exact opposite. More generally, strategic approaches to complex problems are
misaligned with the problems themselves and potentially make firms ill-equipped to address
wicked problems with simplistic approaches.
Define “wicked” problems.
A class of social system problems, which are ill-formulated; where the information is
confusing; where there are many clients and decision makers with conflicting values; and
where the ramifications in the whole system are thoroughly confusing, they are
dynamically-complex, ill-structured, problems that have highly uncertain causes and
outcomes.
, Do a comparison of the characteristics between conventional and wicked
problems.
Discuss the categories of wicked problems.
Three categories of wicked problems:
puzzles (well-defined with optimal solutions),
problems (well-defined but no single
solution), and messes (hard to formulate)
When does strategic misalignment arise?
Strategic misalignments arise when organizations use a decision-making system designed
to address environmental uncertainties that assume linear models with limited complexity
and deliberation. Indeed, the seeds of simple failure, leading to catastrophic failure, rest in
organizational hierarchies where dominant coalitions – senior managers and boards –
display false reactions, such as a confirmation bias, where executives overestimate how
others accept their belief systems, and where core assumptions are not assessed.
The second is an anchor bias, where evidence is quickly accepted that supports existing
assumptions while contrary opinions are downplayed or rejected. In this way, hostility toward
critics is heightened in the hierarchy especially if decision- makers fail to produce real
solutions and, as a result, dire unintended consequences occur.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller labuscwm. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R100,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.