Exam (elaborations)
CLA1503 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (281638)- DISTINCTION GUARANTEED.
- Course
- CLA1503
- Institution
- University Of South Africa
CLA1503 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (281638)- DISTINCTION GUARANTEED.
[Show more]
Content preview
CLA1503 Assignment 1(ANSWERS) Semester 1
2024 (281638)-
DISTINCTION
GUARANTEED.
ADMIN
[COMPANY NAME]
, Well-structured CLA1503 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024
(281638)- DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS -
DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!). ....
Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Question 2 Not yet
answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ Which ONE of the following is the
supreme law of South Africa? 1. English law 2. Roman Dutch law 3. statute
law 4. the Constitution At a public meeting of a resident association the chair
of the meeting calls Samuel a slumlord. The chair of the meetingconfused
Samuel with Samantha. Highly embarrassed by this statement Samuel wishes
to sue the chairperson. Which of Samuel’s rights has the chairperson
infringed? 1. a personality right 2. a personal right 3. a real right 4. an
intellectual property right UNISA 2024 CLA1503-24-S1 Welcome
Message Assessment 1 Question 3 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00
Question 4 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ Which ONE of the
following statements is CORRECT ? 1. A contract cannot be entered into by
more than two parties. 2. An agreement is a particular type of contract. 3. An
agreement is a source of legal obligations. 4. A contract creates legally
enforceable obligations. Mosepe and Shawn entered into an oral contract.
Mosepe is a builder and wanted a van to transport building material andwas
under the impression that they had entered into a contract of sale for a van.
Shawn however was under the impressionthat a contract of lease for the van
had been concluded. Mosepe approaches you for advice regarding the validity
of thecontract. Which ONE of the following statements is CORRECT ? 1. The
contract is valid because both Mosepe and Shawn had the intention to be
contractually bound. 2. The contract is void because there was no consensus
between Mosepe and Shawn. 3. The contract is voidable because the parties
can rectify the contract. 4. The contract is valid in all material respects
because there was offer and acceptance.
For the first question: The supreme law of South Africa is 4. the Constitution.
For the second question: The right that the chairperson infringed upon is 1. a personality right.
For the third question: The correct statement is 4. A contract creates legally enforceable
obligations.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MasterVincent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R46,66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now