100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2024 R51,54   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2024

 23 views  0 purchase

CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2024 ... 100 % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 . 1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly 2018 (2) S...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • March 23, 2024
  • 15
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (60)
avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro
CSL2601
ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2024

, CSL2601
Assignment 2

Semester 1 2024
1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the
National Assembly 2018 (2) SA 571 (CC) (EFF II) is that the judiciary has too much political
power and intrudes into the executive domain.


2. As a member of the uMkhonto we Sizwe party, former President Jacob Zuma has
announced his intention to campaign against the right of LGBTIQ+ people to a family life. His
opinion is that the ‘legislation supporting same-sex marriage lacks support from the majority
of SA’. This scenario is an example of the principle of subsidiarity.


3. When carefully analysed, the recent case of United Democratic Movement and Others v
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 280; 005779/2023 (5 May 2023) –
the “loadshedding” case – is an instance of judicial over-reach.


4. The counter-majoritarian dilemma has no relevance to South African Constitutional Law. It
is simply a convenient excuse that politicians invoke when the judiciary is counter-
revolutionary.

5. The horizontal distribution of power in South Africa is exactly how multi-sphere governance
works in South Africa.


6. The formal removal of an official office-bearer for gross misconduct or gross incompetence
is known as recusal.

7. According to the case of de Lille and Another v Speaker of the National Assembly 1998 (3)
SA 785 (CC), parliamentary privilege is the right to freedom of speech of members of
parliament and the protection not to be held liable to civil or criminal proceedings, arrest,
imprisonment or damages for saying or revealing anything in Parliament.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R51,54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R51,54
  • (0)
  Buy now