Exam (elaborations)
ADL2601 Assignment 2 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (666334) - DUE 30 April 2024
- Course
- ADL2601
- Institution
- University Of South Africa
100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions: For assistance contact
[Show more]
Content preview
ADL2601Assignment 2
QUIZ
(COMPLETE
ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2024
(666334) - DUE
30 April 2024
, Which one of the following is NOT a form of judicial control? Judicial Review.
Statutory Appeal. Interdict. A declaratory mandamus order. Clear my choice
The option "Statutory Appeal" is not a form of judicial control. It's a mechanism through which a
higher court reviews the decision of a lower court based on statutory provisions rather than
exercising direct control over the legality or constitutionality of laws or actions, which is the
essence of judicial review. So, you can clear that choice.
Question 2 Which one of the following is NOT an example of or a form of
internal control? Chapter 9 (of the Constitution) institutions. Parliamentary
control. Control by public bodies and commissions, such as the public
protector and the auditor general. Control by superior or senior administrators
or specially constituted bodies or institutions.
The option "Chapter 9 (of the Constitution) institutions" is not an example of internal control.
Chapter 9 institutions typically refer to independent constitutional bodies established to support
and safeguard democracy, such as the Human Rights Commission or the Public Protector. While
they play a crucial role in ensuring accountability and transparency in governance, they are not
directly involved in internal control mechanisms within government agencies or organizations.
Therefore, you can clear that choice.
Question 3 The court held that ticking boxes on the standard form reasons
letter is inadequate since this ticking of boxes disclose nothing of the
reasoning process or the information upon which it is based. Identify the case
in which this court decision was made. Bel Porto School Governing Body v
Premier, Western Cape 2002 9 BCLR 891 (CC). Nomala v Permanent
Secretary, Department of Welfare 2001 8 BCLR 844 (E). Moletsane v The
Premier of the Free State 1995 9 BCLR 1285 (O). Minister of Environmental
Affairs and Tourism v Phambili Fisheries (Pty) Ltd; Minister of Environmental
Affairs and Tourism v Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd [2003] 2 All SA 616 (SCA).
The case in which the court held that ticking boxes on a standard form reasons letter is
inadequate is "Bel Porto School Governing Body v Premier, Western Cape 2002 9 BCLR 891
(CC)".
Question 4 The requirement of lawfulness has the effect that Judicial review
can no longer be excluded. Parliamentary review can no longer be excluded.
Executive review can no longer be excluded. The Public Protector’s review
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Solutionist. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R47,37. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
69252 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now