100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PYC4803 Assignment 2 2024 (785738) - DUE 26 July 2024 R46,65   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PYC4803 Assignment 2 2024 (785738) - DUE 26 July 2024

 24 views  3 purchases

PYC4803 Assignment 2 2024 (785738) - DUE 26 July 2024 QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • July 10, 2024
  • 17
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (11)
avatar-seller
inotes
[Company name]



PYC4803
Assignment 2
2024 (785738) -
DUE 26 July 2024
QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE ANSWERS

,PYC4803 Assignment 2 2024 (785738) - DUE 26 July 2024

(A) Give your own example of destructive obedience that occurred in your
society and explain possible reasons as to the underlying reasons why people
comply with this form of social influence. (20 marks)
Example of Destructive Obedience: The Marikana Massacre
Context: One of the most tragic examples of destructive obedience in South
African history is the Marikana Massacre that occurred on August 16, 2012. This
incident involved the South African Police Service (SAPS) opening fire on a group
of striking mineworkers at the Lonmin platinum mine in Marikana, resulting in the
death of 34 miners and injuries to many others.
Possible Reasons for Compliance with Destructive Obedience
1. Authority and Legitimacy:
o Perception of Authority: The police officers involved were acting
under the orders of higher-ranking officials. The hierarchical structure
within the police force often means that lower-ranking officers feel
compelled to obey commands from their superiors, even if they
personally disagree with the orders.
o Legitimacy of Orders: The orders to use force were perceived as
legitimate due to the legal authority and the mandate given to the
police to maintain law and order. This perception can lead individuals
to comply without questioning the morality or potential consequences
of their actions.
2. Deindividuation:
o Group Dynamics: In a large group setting, individual police officers
may feel less personally responsible for their actions. This
phenomenon, known as deindividuation, can lead to a loss of self-
awareness and a diminished sense of personal accountability.
o Uniform and Anonymity: Wearing uniforms can further enhance this
effect, as it reinforces the collective identity over individual identity,
making it easier for officers to follow orders without considering the
personal moral implications.

, 3. Social and Institutional Pressure:
o Conformity to Group Norms: Within the police force, there may be
strong norms and expectations regarding obedience and loyalty to the
group. Officers may fear ostracism, disciplinary action, or loss of
status if they do not comply with orders.
o Institutional Culture: The culture within the police force can
emphasize the importance of following orders and maintaining
discipline, often at the expense of individual moral judgment. This
institutional pressure can compel officers to act in ways they might
not otherwise consider.
4. Moral Disengagement:
o Justification of Actions: The process of moral disengagement
involves rationalizing or justifying one's actions to avoid feelings of
guilt or shame. Officers might convince themselves that their actions
were necessary to restore order or that the miners were a legitimate
threat.
o Euphemistic Labeling: Using sanitized language to describe their
actions (e.g., "dispersing a crowd" instead of "shooting unarmed
miners") can help individuals distance themselves from the moral
implications of their behavior.
5. Fear and Self-Preservation:
o Fear of Reprisal: Officers might comply with destructive orders out
of fear of personal consequences, such as losing their jobs, facing
legal action, or being harmed by the miners.
o Perceived Threat: In high-stress situations, the perception of a threat
can be heightened. The miners were armed with traditional weapons,
and the police might have believed that they were acting in self-
defense or to prevent greater violence.
6. Situational Factors:
o High-Stress Environment: The chaotic and volatile environment of
the strike could have created a high-stress situation where rational

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller inotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R46,65. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R46,65  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now