Exam (elaborations)
CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 10 September 2024
- Course
- CSL2601 (CSL2601)
- Institution
- University Of South Africa
CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS
[Show more]
Content preview
[Company name]CSL2601
Assignment 2
Semester 2 2024 -
DUE 10 September
2024
QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED ANSWERS
, CSL2601 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 10 September 2024
In the early 1990s when South Africa was contemplating transition to
democracy, Wiechers advanced the case for the establishment of a
constitutional court. He argued that this court would be able to protect and
enforce human rights and liberties [and] to provide expert knowledge and
the political as well as socio-economic understanding which is needed to
judge intricate constitutional processes and issues.1 This view echoes the
contemporary view that the Constitution2 that was designed to
revolutionise the South African state reflects the needs and interests of all
South Africans.3 In its articulation of a unique form of the separation of
powers doctrine4 and in pursuit of ensuring a modern, robust constitutional
democracy, the judiciary has viewed its role as complementary to (as
opposed to distinct from) the legislative and executive branches of the
state. As Corder remarks, in its first 15 years, the Constitutional Court’s
judgments were ‘careful, wide, fair and at time courageous commitment to
constitutional principle and practice’.5 So determined is the judiciary to
uphold constitutional principle and practice that it has recently admonished
the executive, with a court declaring that a particular government
department was ‘grossly non-compliant’ and its representatives had shown
up late for the court hearing.6 Some important developments in South
African constitutional law are set out below. First, for the first time in South
Africa’s history, two judges and the Public Protector were impeached.
South Africa also has a multi-party government for the first time since the
advent of democracy thirty years ago. _________________ 1 Marinus
Wiechers ‘A constitutional court for South Africa’ in DJ van Vuuren et al
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smillanih. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R45,38. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now