100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IOP4861 Exam pack 2024(Questions and answers) R45,10   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

IOP4861 Exam pack 2024(Questions and answers)

 6 views  0 purchase

IOP4861 Exam pack 2024(Questions and answers) With accurate answers and assurance that they are in the exam.

Preview 4 out of 112  pages

  • July 17, 2024
  • 112
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (24)
avatar-seller
gabrielmusyoka940
IOP4861 EXAM
PACK 2024

QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS
FOR ASSISTANCE CONTACT
EMAIL:gabrielmusyoka940@gmail.com

, lOMoARcPSD|31863004




Outcome 1:

1 - The history of psychological assessment in general, and in the South African context, is
discussed in depth and critically analysed in terms of its impact on enhancing and developing
fair assessment practices to date.

History of psychological assessment in the South African context:

Early years:

Assessment can be traced back to early times. Assessment has roots in the following:

• Astrology
o Using position of stars and planets to determine personal attributes.
• Physiognomy
o Judging character by external features of the body, especially the face, in relation to
the similarity these features have with those of animals.
• Humorology
o Four body humours (blood, yellow bile, black bile, phlegm).
o Four types of temperament relating to these humours (sanguine, choleric,
melancholic, phlegmatic).
o Only hypothesis, never objectively verified.
o Assosciated with introversion/extroversion and emotionally stable/emotionally
unstable personality types.
o Forms basis of Myers Briggs type indicator and 16 personality factor questionnaire.
• Phrenology
o Science of reading people’s heads.
o Belief that brain consists of various organs that correspond with personality types and
cognitive faculties.
o By feeling bumps on the head one could determine personality.
• Chirology
o Palmreading to determine personality.
• Graphology
o Study of handwriting.

SA was a British colony. Assessment stems from this heritage. Introduction of psychological
assessment followed a similar pattern to USA and Europe. Important to note that the different context
that the development in SA took place in. Psychological assessment developed in an environment
characterised by unequal distribution of resources based on racial differences. Assessment reflected
this racially segregated society. Apartheid politics impacted the development of assessment.

Early assessments standardised only for whites and used by education department to place white
pupils in special education. Early measures were adaptations of overseas measures. These
adaptations were not only standardised for whites but also driven by political ideologies. Measures in
intelligence were used to draw distinctions between races and show superiority of one group over the
other.

The early use of assessment measures in industry

Gained momentum after WW2 in 1948 when the Nationalist government came to power. Measures
developed in response to societal need. There was an urgent need to identify the occupational
suitability (especially for work on the mines) of a large number of Africans who had received very little
formal education.

One of the better methods of this time was the General Adaptability Battery (GAB). This included a
practice session during the test. Mainly used for the preliterate African population.

Due to job reservation and better educational opportunities, whites competed for different jobs to
Africans. OTIS Mental Ability Test, with American norms, often used to test whites in industry.




Downloaded by Gabriel Musyoka (gabrielmusyoka940@gmail.com)

, lOMoARcPSD|31863004




Development of psychological assessment from 1960 onwards:

Large number of assessments developed between 1960 and 1984. National institute for Personnel
research developed measures for industry. Institute for Psychological and Edumetric Research
developed measures for education and clinical practice. Both these institutes were incorporated into
the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC).

Tests were developed along racial lines, little need for common tests as groups did not compete with
each other. Few measures were developed for blacks, coloureds and Indians.

During 80’s and 90’s the political climate began to change and Apartheid laws were repealed. Racial
groups began competing directly for same jobs and the use of separate measures came under close
scrutiny. Measures began to be developed for more than one racial group and norms were developed
for the various racial groups.

Examples:

• General Scholastic Aptitude Test GSAT
• Ability, Processing of Information and Learning Battery APIL-B
• Paper and Pencil Games PPG, first assessment available in all 11 official languages.

Little research was done to determine suitability of tests for a multicultural SA. Research was needed
to determine the biases of tests.

Owen in 1986 determined there was significant differences between results for races on various tests
and stated that work was needed to reduce the differential differences between the various race
groups. Taylor in 1987 recognised the responsibility of practitioners to reduce such biases.

The misuse of tests and the Nationalist government using results to exclude certain races from jobs
and educational opportunities, lead to a distrust of psychological measures with large portions of the
psychological community rejecting testing altogether.

In the 1970’s legislation was promulgated restricting the use of testing to psychological practitioners
only.

Psychological assessment in the democratic South Africa:

Post 1994 there was a growing need to address past imbalances.

Employment Equity Act and Professional practice guidelines implemented to ensure fair and unbiased
testing and eliminate discriminatory practices.




Downloaded by Gabriel Musyoka (gabrielmusyoka940@gmail.com)

, lOMoARcPSD|31863004




Outcome 1:

2 - Developments in the areas of cognitive assessment, personality assessment and
behavioural assessment are critically analysed and applied in various work-related contexts.

History of cognitive assessment:

Historical development of the concept of intelligence:

• Francis Galton
o First real effort of measuring intelligence.
o Tried to explain that intelligence or genius ran in certain families.
o Believed intelligence was inherited and biologically determined.
o Perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning and other
cognitive processes were dependant on the power of the nervous system.
o Tried to link psycho-physiological processes such as reaction time, sensory
discrimination, visual and hearing acuity to intelligence.
o This approached was proved to be wrong.
• James Mckeen Cattell
o First North American proponent of testing.
o Similar belief to Galton.
o Sensory, perceptual and motor process were the fundamental elements of thought.
o Coined the term mental test.
• Alfred Binet
o Set out to devise a means of identifying children with lower intelligence, who needed
special education, which was more objective than teacher observation.
o Intelligence was a high-level ability to which mental judgement was the key.
o Intelligence assessed using relatively complex thought patterns usually displayed in
everyday life and in the ability to learn within an academic setting.
o Used a set of questions and developed age level norms in answering questions.
Used this information to determine the “mental age” of a child.
o Known as Simon-Binet tests.
• Lewis Therman
o Adapted Simon-Binet tests for use in America.
o Became Stanford-Binet tests, and is one of the most widely used tests today.
o Expressed level of performance in terms of intelligence quotient – IQ.
• David Weschler
o Developed Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) and Weschler Adult
Intelligence Scale (WAIC).
o Differentiated between two types of scholastic intelligence: verbal and performance,
which were measured by different sub tests.
o Introduced a statistical method for calculating IQ




Downloaded by Gabriel Musyoka (gabrielmusyoka940@gmail.com)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gabrielmusyoka940. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R45,10. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R45,10
  • (0)
  Buy now