100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL2601 ASSIGNMENT 02 2024 SEMESTER 1 R55,00   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MRL2601 ASSIGNMENT 02 2024 SEMESTER 1

 11 views  0 purchase

MRL2601 ASSIGNMENT 02 2024 SEM6

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • July 17, 2024
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (55)
avatar-seller
bsenedict
Assignment 2

ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW

MRL2601

Semester 2

Department of Mercantile Law

, QUESTION 1

Johannes, Phineas and Beauty are Mnandi CC’s members. Beauty has discovered that
Phineas concluded a contract on behalf of Mnandi CC for the purchase of a yacht
without consent of any of the other members. She is of the opinion that Mnandi CC
should not be bound to the contract because the corporation’s main business is
catering. In addition, she shows you the association agreement which stipulates that
only Johannes is authorised to conclude contracts on behalf of Mnandi CC. Advise
Beauty whether or not Mnandi CC is bound to the contract concluded by Phineas. Refer
to relevant case law in your answer.




To determine whether Mnandi CC is bound by the contract Phineas concluded for the
purchase of a yacht, we need to consider several legal principles surrounding agency,
authority, and the limits of a company’s activities.

1. Authority to Contract

According to the association agreement of Mnandi CC, only Johannes is authorized to
conclude contracts on behalf of the company. This clearly indicates that Phineas acted
outside his authority by entering into the contract without the required consent.

2. Actual vs. Apparent Authority

- Actual Authority: Phineas did not have actual authority to enter the contract, as per the
association agreement.
- Apparent Authority: For Mnandi CC to be bound by Phineas’s actions, it would need to be
shown that he had apparent authority. This generally requires that third parties have
reasonable grounds to believe that the agent had authority.

3. Case Law

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bsenedict. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R55,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R55,00
  • (0)
  Buy now