100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
EDL3703 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (351858) - DUE 28 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. R49,38
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

EDL3703 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (351858) - DUE 28 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.

 7 views  0 purchase

EDL3703 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 (351858) - DUE 28 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • July 20, 2024
  • 9
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (17)
avatar-seller
MasterVincent
EDL3703 Assignment
2 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2
2024 (351858) - DUE 28
August 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED Complete,
trusted solutions and
explanations.




ADMIN
[COMPANY NAME]

, Assignment 02 With reference to two relevant cases (namely one
related to a leamer's Rastafarian dreadlock hairstyle and the other
to the wearing of a nose-atud by a learner), briefly explain how the
South African courts have dealt with disputes between leamers
and school goveming bodies about leamers hairstyles and the
wearing of certain pieces of jewellery which are contrary to the
school's code of conduct in your answer you must also discuss
how the courts have interpreted the various nights affecting such
disputes


To address the assignment on how South African courts have
handled disputes related to learners' hairstyles and the wearing of
jewelry that contravene the school's code of conduct, we will look
into two key cases: Prince v President of the Law Society of the
Cape of Good Hope and Pillay v KwaZulu-Natal Department of
Education. These cases demonstrate how courts interpret the
rights involved in such disputes.
Case 1: Prince v President of the Law Society of the Cape of
Good Hope
Facts:
• The case involved a Rastafarian law graduate, Gareth Prince,
who was refused admission to the legal profession due to his
use of cannabis, which is a part of his religious practice.
• Although not directly related to school governance, this case
sets a precedent for how the courts view religious expression.
Court's Decision:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MasterVincent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R49,38. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R49,38
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added