100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
LJU4801 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 3 September 2024 Course Legal Philosophy (LJU4801) Institution University Of South Africa (Unisa) Book An Introduction to African Legal PhilosophyR46,50
Add to cart
LJU4801 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 3 September 2024 Course Legal Philosophy (LJU4801) Institution University Of South Africa (Unisa) Book An Introduction to African Legal Philosophy
LJU4801 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 3 September 2024
Course
Legal Philosophy (LJU4801)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
An Introduction to African Legal Philosophy
LJU4801 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2
2024 - DUE 3
September 2024 ;
100% TRUSTED
Complete, trusted
solutions and
explanations.
ADMIN
[COMPANY NAME]
, When answering questions, students are expected to make use of
the study guide as well as any other relevant source to the
question. The study guide must be referenced like any other
sourceWith reference to the judgment in Prince v President of the
Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope 2002 (2) SA 794, discuss
the philosophical approaches the majority and minority decisions
followed. Mary Joe Frug argues that the law “encodes” the female
body with meaning. Briefly discuss how the law mandates the
sexualisation of the female body. Your answer should not exceed
250 words.
Philosophical Approaches in Prince v President of the Law
Society of the Cape of Good Hope
In Prince v President of the Law Society of the Cape of Good
Hope (2002 (2) SA 794), the majority and minority judgments
reflected distinct philosophical approaches. The majority, led by
Justice Langa, adopted a rights-based approach emphasizing the
individual's constitutional rights, including freedom of religion.
This perspective prioritized the applicant's right to religious
expression and autonomy, viewing the case through the lens of
fundamental freedoms as protected by the South African
Constitution.
In contrast, the minority judgment, represented by Justice
O'Regan, focused on the impact of the applicant's actions on
public order and the legal profession's standards. This approach
was more concerned with the practical implications of
accommodating the applicant's religious practices, weighing the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jennifer2024. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R46,50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
