[Type the document subtitle]
LEV3701
Assignment 1
Semester 2
2024 (150297)-
DUE 21
August 2024
[Pick the date]
[Type the company name]
, Book
Principles of Evidence
LEV3701 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024
(150297)- DUE 21 August 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted
solutions and explanationsEnsure your success with us..
Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ Consider the following
statements about the compellability of spouses to testify and choose the
correct option: 1. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 has, to
some extent, been amended by section 68 of theCriminal Law (Sexual
Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007. Subsection
195(1)(a) nowexcludes a child that is merely in the care of the wife or the
husband. 2. In terms of section 196 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977,
the spouse of an accused is a competent as wellas a compellable witness in
defence of that accused, but only when such an accused is jointly charged
withsomeone else. 3. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 is
applicable not only to people who are married whentestifying is at stake, but
also to people who were married when the relevant crime was committed,
even though themarriage has been dissolved in the meantime. 4. If the
accused is jointly charged with someone else, the spouse of such an accused
will be competent andcompellable to give evidence on behalf of that co-
accused. Clear my choice UNISA 2024 LEV3701-24-S2 Welcome
Message Assessment 1 Question 2 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00
QUIZ A crowd of people that are attending a rock concert are attacked and
robbed of their wallets and jewelry. X, Y and Z, membersof the audience,
capture footage of the criminals on a camera (non-digital), a video-camera
(non-digital) and a cellular-phonerespectively. The robbers are caught and
charged with robbery. Consider the following statements about the trial
evidenceand choose the correct option: 1. The photograph taken by X can be
regarded as documentary evidence because it is used to represent
somethingthat is the subject matter of the court case. 2. According to S v
Mpumlo 1986 (3) SA 485 (E) and S v Baleka (1) 1986 (4) SA 192 (T) the
videotape footage by Y canbe classifi ed as documentary evidence. 3. The