100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CRL 202 Criminal Conduct Notes R135,86   Add to cart

Class notes

CRL 202 Criminal Conduct Notes

 5 views  0 purchase

Detailed and comprehensive note on Criminal Conduct for CRL 202. *Essential!! *At a price that's fair enough!!

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • August 25, 2024
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Prof. albertus
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (11)
avatar-seller
anyiamgeorge19
TOPIC 2: CRIMINAL CONDUCT

A. B 1994 (2) SACR 237 (E) [Protective relationship]
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP
 X was a woman, Y was X’s boyfriend and was E was X’s son
 X and E stayed with Y
 Y abused E over time and X was aware of it and did nothing
 E died
 X and Y were found guilty
 X had a legal duty to protect E because of the parent-child relationship and
because she was aware of it.

B. BEYERS 1968 (3) SA 70 (A) [Court Order]

 X arranged with a trade union
 X gained an interdict, issued by civil court
 Could not be charged

C. CARMICHELE V MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY 2001 (4) SA 938
(C) [Ex lege duty]

 Ito the development of human rights
 Carmichele was assaulted, claimed damages for injuries sufffered. Claim was that
police failed to protect her
 The accused has a history of violent crimes: rape etc.
 HC and SCA rejected claim of assault because there was no duty in common law
from police
 In CC, accepted that there was no duty.
 But viewed that common law did not correspond to section 39(2) and s173 of the
Constitution.
 CC that both sections forces the common law to be developed and both HC and
SCA had to relook at the claim
 HC found that there was a ex lege duty on the officer and prosecutor but both
failed to do so.
 Claim was then successful.
 Establishes that there is civil liability on the part of the state if they fail to do that.

D. CLASSEN 1979 (4) SA 460 (ZS)

 3 individuals : X was the owner, Y was a teenage girl and X was the passenger. Y
collided with V and he died
 X was charged of culpable homicide allowing Y to drive
 Had a legal duty to guide her while driving
 Held criminal liable ito omission liability

E. EUSTACE 1948 (3) SA 859 (T): [Control of a dangerous object or animal]

 Had a vicious dog that attacked people regularly.
 On one occasion, the dog attacked a 10 year old girl and she died.
 X was held liable because he had a legal duty to control the dog.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R135,86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79064 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R135,86
  • (0)
  Buy now