100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MRL3702 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE SOLUTIONS) Semester 2 2024 (184462) R51,08
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MRL3702 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE SOLUTIONS) Semester 2 2024 (184462)

 15 views  0 purchase

MRL3702 Assignment 2 Full Solutions Semester 2 2024 (184462) - DUE 13 September 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... Seun and Jan, new lawyers in the market, are debating on ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • September 13, 2024
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (10)
avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro
MRL3702
ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 2 2024
UNIQUE NO.184462
DUE DATE: 13 SEPTEMBER 2024

, MRL3702

Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024

Unique Number: 184462

Due Date: 13 September 2024

Labour Law

Seun and Jan's view, suggesting that Sara-Lee would need to raise R100,000 by taking
a bank loan to compensate Sani Jacobs for the damage caused in the accident,
overlooks key aspects of employer liability under the doctrine of vicarious liability. In
legal terms, Sara-Lee’s employer may bear responsibility for the damages, not just
Sara-Lee personally.

Vicarious Liability Explained:

Vicarious liability is a legal principle where an employer can be held liable for the
wrongful acts committed by an employee during the course of their employment,
provided these acts were committed in the scope of employment and for the benefit of
the employer.

Key Factors:

1. Was Sara-Lee acting within the scope of her employment?

In this scenario, Sara-Lee was driving her employer’s car to perform audit
work at the SABC. This task was directly related to her duties as an
employee. Thus, her actions fall within the scope of her employment.

2. Was the act closely connected to the employer’s business?

Since the errand was for work (performing an audit at SABC), Sara-Lee’s use
of the vehicle was connected to the employer’s business. The fact that she
was running late and driving negligently does not negate the employer's

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R51,08. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52507 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R51,08
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added