100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
MHR5904 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2024 - DUE 1 October 2024 R50,91   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

MHR5904 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2024 - DUE 1 October 2024

 33 views  2 purchases

MHR5904 Assignment 2 (QUESTIONS & ANSWERS) 2024 - DUE 1 October 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)...........

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • September 17, 2024
  • 12
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro
MHR5904
ASSIGNMENT 2 2024
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 1 OCTOBER 2024

, MHR5904

Assignment 2 2024

Unique Number:

Due Date: 01 October 2024

Human Rights Interpretation

Essay
Critical Engagement with S v Makwanyane and the Abolition of the Death Penalty
in South Africa
Introduction

The S v Makwanyane (1995) case is a landmark decision in South African constitutional
law, as it declared the death penalty unconstitutional under the new democratic order.
The judgment is a rich legal document that touches upon human rights,
constitutionalism, and the role of the judiciary in a nascent democracy. This essay
provides a critical analysis of the reasoning in Makwanyane, with particular attention to
the constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and the right to life. I argue that
while the Constitutional Court’s decision was correctly grounded in the constitutional
framework, it leaves unresolved tensions about retributive justice and public opinion.

1. Constitutional Foundations and the Role of the Death Penalty

The Constitutional Court’s reasoning in Makwanyane centered on the fundamental
rights contained in Sections 9 (equality), 10 (dignity), and 11 (life) of the Interim
Constitution (1993). Chief Justice Chaskalson, delivering the majority judgment,
contended that capital punishment inherently violated the right to life and dignity. He
based his reasoning not only on South African law but also on international human
rights principles (Chaskalson, 1995). Comparative constitutional law, particularly from
Germany and India, significantly influenced the judgment, reflecting a cosmopolitan
approach to constitutional interpretation.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,91  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now