100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Contract Law - Consideration and Estoppel Summary R193,04   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Oxford University (OX)
  4.  
  5. Contract Law

Summary

Contract Law - Consideration and Estoppel Summary
 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Contract Law
  • Institution
  • Oxford University (OX)

Comprehensive summary/exam notes on consideration and estoppel in Contract Law. This document covers whether performance of a contractual duty owed to the promisor, performance of a duty imposed by law, past payment of a debt, and past consideration can be sufficient consideration, as well as the p...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • October 6, 2024
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

  • contract law
  • consideration
  • estoppel
  • williams v roffey
  • stilk v myrick
  • part payment of debt
  • foakes v beer
  • rock advertising ltd
  • past consideration
  • promissory estoppel
  • dc builders v rees
  • walton stores v m

Written for

  • Oxford University (OX)
  • Unknown
  • Contract Law
All documents for this subject (11)

Seller

avatar-seller
bethjscott5713

Content preview

Consideration and Estoppel
Consideration:
1. General:
The orthodox view is that the doctrine of consideration is based on the idea of
‘reciprocity’ –
That a promisee should not be able to enforce a promise unless he has given
or promised to give something in exchange.
2. Performance of a contractual duty owed to the promisor:
e.g., will continue and complete the work previously agreed to do.
Original view – dating back to case of Stilk v Myrick:
The performance of an existing contractual duty owed to a promisor was no
consideration for a fresh promise.
BUT – the court in later case of Williams v Roffey took a very different, pragmatic
approach.
Placed an emphasis on the practical benefit gained by the defendant.
In that case, there was no one practical benefit which the defendants were
held to have obtained as a result of the claimant’s promise.
Their ‘benefits’ included the claimant not breaching their contract,
being spared the “trouble and expense” of finding another contractor,
avoiding a penalty for delay in completion, and an improved payment
and work schedule.
As Purchas LJ said himself, although in “normal circumstances the
suggestion that a contracting party can rely on his own breach to establish
consideration is distinctly unattractive”, it was appropriate and applicable on
the facts of the case in conjunction with the other benefits identified.
Does not formally challenge the rule that a promise to perform an existing
duty owed to the promisor does not constitute consideration.
BUT – the change in emphasis has undermined the traditional rule
and the courts today do not require much persuasion in order to find
the existence of consideration.
3. Performance of a duty imposed by law:
Orthodox position = performance of an existing duty imposed by law does not
constitute consideration.
Ward v Byham – father promised to pay mother of his illegitimate child £1 a week
provided that the child was well looked after and happy.
Denning LJ –
Launched a direct assault on the general rule, holding that the mother
provided ample consideration by performing her legal duty to support
the child.
Morris LJ –
The fact that the mother promised to do more than her legal duty by
promising to keep the child ‘happy’ constituted ample consideration.
Glasbrook Ltd v Glamorgan CC –
A promise to do more than one is legally obliged to do is good consideration.
In this case, providing police officers on site of strike was going beyond their
public duty.
4. Part Payment of a Debt:
General rule = a promise to accept part payment of a debt in discharge of the entire
debt is not supported by consideration.
Already contractually obliged to repay the entire debt.
Unless agree to repay at an earlier date?
Foakes v Beer – upheld Pinnel’s case

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bethjscott5713. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R193,04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78834 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R193,04
  • (0)
  Buy now