100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Trusts Law - Knowing Receipt R169,39   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Oxford University (OX)
  4.  
  5. Trusts Law

Summary

Summary Trusts Law - Knowing Receipt
 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Trusts Law
  • Institution
  • Oxford University (OX)

Comprehensive summary/exam notes on the topic of knowing receipt in Trusts Law. This document covers three different explanations behind the knowing receipt claim: unjust enrichment (put forward by Lord Nicholls and Birks), wrongs (put forward by Smith and Swadling), and a constructive trustee (put...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • October 7, 2024
  • 3
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

  • trusts law
  • knowing receipt
  • unjust enrichment
  • byers v saudi national bank

Written for

  • Oxford University (OX)
  • Unknown
  • Trusts Law
All documents for this subject (10)

Seller

avatar-seller
bethjscott5713

Content preview

Knowing Receipt
1. Introduction:
Knowing Receipt = refers to the personal liability of non-trustees for losses arising
to trusts.
Liability in such cases arises where the non-trustee receives trust property (or
continues to hold trust property) in the knowledge that it is in breach of trust.
The elements of a knowing receipt claim are well established:
There must be rights received in breach of trust, they must be received for the
recipient’s own benefit, the recipient must know that it was in breach of trust,
and the beneficiary’s rights cannot have been distinguished by receipt (Byers
v Saudi National Bank).
BUT – the explanation behind the knowing receipt claim is more contested.
To characterise the recipient as a trustee is a mistake.
Explanations:
- Unjust enrichment
- Wrongs
- Constructive trustee
2. Unjust Enrichment:
Put forward by Lord Nicholls and Birks.
Bank Financier – there are three requirements of an unjust enrichment claim.
(1) Enrichment of D
(2) At C’s expense
(3) Unjust factor.
Just not present on the case law.
Beneficial receipt requirement in Agip –
The only explanation that comes close to explaining this.
At C’s expense requirement:
This requires direct transfer of value from C to D.
BUT – in a knowing receipt claim, the transfer comes from the trustee or a 3 rd
party, definitely not from the beneficiary.
Unjust factor:
Birks states that this is ignorance.
BUT – as Swadling points out, there is no case that says this is an unjust
factor.
Especially considering how long the doctrines of unjust enrichment
and knowing receipt have been around for.
3. Wrongs:
Smith – knowing receipt is equity’s analogue of conversion.
Conversion = about protection of title over chattels.
BUT – say that both involve wrongful interference with property.
Is very controversial as to whether B has a property right.
Conversion = strict.
Knowing receipt requires knowledge.
Conversion requires an action.
Knowing receipt is not like that – e.g., if money is transferred into a
bank account.
Swadling – ‘Inconsistent Dealing’
Immediately on receipt, D has an obligation to reconvey rights – BUT – not
trustee.
SO – if then transfer them to different third party, this is then inconsistently
dealing with this.
Cause of action arises at different points.
All others – at receipt

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bethjscott5713. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R169,39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78834 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R169,39
  • (0)
  Buy now