100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PVL3704 Exam Portfolio 2024 | October 2024 R80,00   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PVL3704 Exam Portfolio 2024 | October 2024

 14 views  2 purchases

PVL3704 Exam Portfolio 2024 | October 2024

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • October 8, 2024
  • 15
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (57)
avatar-seller
Heartutor
PVL3704
OCTOBER 2024


A truck that delivered your new neighbour's pavement bricks is parked in the driveway in front of your
gate. You request the driver to move the truck so that you can pull your car out. He refuses, stating
that he will only move the truck once he has been reimbursed by your neighbour for the transportation
of the bricks. You try to get hold of your new neighbour without any success. As you urgently need
to drive to town to open your shop for the day’s business, you write a check for the amount that the
driver mentioned and hand it to him. You now wish to claim this amount from your neighbour.


Discuss the nature of the claim in the current instance, including the remedy that is possibly
available to you and what you can claim with this remedy. Refer comprehensively to relevant
case law in your answer.




1. Nature of the Claim


In this instance, your claim against the neighbor is based on the legal principle of unjust enrichment.
Unjust enrichment occurs when one party benefits or is enriched at the expense of another without a
valid legal justification. Here, your neighbor is enriched because you paid for the transportation of the
pavement bricks, which is their responsibility. The payment you made on their behalf was necessary
for you to avoid inconvenience and proceed with your business, but it was not your obligation.


2. Remedy Available: Condictio Indebiti
The most appropriate remedy in this case is the condictio indebiti, which is a recognized enrichment
action in South African law. This action is available when a person makes a payment or transfers
something under the mistaken belief that they were legally obliged to do so, or when the payment is
made to discharge another’s obligation.


Mistaken Payment

, While it may not have been a mistake in the conventional sense, you made the payment under the
belief that it was necessary to resolve the situation quickly.




This can be considered a form of necessitas (necessity), as you acted out of necessity rather than
an obligation.
Third-Party Payment: South African courts have recognized that if a person pays a debt owed by
another, they may recover the amount paid if it was done under necessity and to protect their own
interest. The neighbor’s refusal to take responsibility for the payment places you in a position where
you had to act to prevent harm to yourself (loss of business).


3. Relevant Case Law
The following case law supports your claim for recovery under the principles of unjust enrichment:


Nortjé v Pool: Although this case emphasizes that South African law does not have a general
enrichment action, it highlights that specific enrichment actions such as the condictio indebiti and
other similar actions are available to address situations where one party is unjustly enriched.
Govender v Standard Bank: This case clarified the application of the condictio indebiti, particularly
when payments are made under the belief that they are due. Even though the bank was not directly
obligated to pay, it recovered the money paid in error, illustrating that payments made under mistaken
belief or compulsion (necessity) can be reclaimed.


4. Requirements for Condictio Indebiti
To succeed in a claim under the condictio indebiti, you need to show that:


The payment was made under the belief that it was necessary.
The payment was not legally due by you but rather by your neighbor.
Your neighbor was enriched at your expense, as they benefited from the delivery service you paid
for.


Remedy

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Heartutor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R80,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82215 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R80,00  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now