100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
APC3701 09 OCT 2024 exam elaborate QUALITY ANSWERS R59,33   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

APC3701 09 OCT 2024 exam elaborate QUALITY ANSWERS

 7 views  0 purchase

Exam of 9 pages for the course APC3701 at Unisa (Essay questions)

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • October 9, 2024
  • 9
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (17)
avatar-seller
nancylonake
QUALITY ANSWERS FOR ACP3701

OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2024

09 OCTOBER 2024

MODULE CODE: APC3701

THE POLITICS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA

OPTION 2

Since its independence in 1966, the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) is the only

party to have governed Botswana. Despite its recognised success, Botswana has
had an ambivalent experience with liberal democracy. It is contended that

Botswana falls within a ‘grey zone’, in-between what scholars refer to as electoral

and liberal democracies (De Jager & Sebudubudu, 2016).Taking the above

statement into consideration, evaluate democracy/democratization in Botswana

since its first elections in 1966.



Democracy and Democratization in Botswana Since 1966

Since gaining independence in 1966, Botswana has often been regarded as a model for

political stability and good governance in Africa. At the heart of this reputation lies the

Botswana Democratic Party (BDP), which has won every election since independence

and has maintained a firm grip on power for over five decades. However, despite its
celebrated political stability, Botswana’s experience with democracy is more ambivalent

than it appears at first glance. Scholars such as De Jager and Sebudubudu (2016)

argue that Botswana exists in a “grey zone,” straddling the boundary between electoral

democracy and full liberal democracy. This essay critically evaluates Botswana’s
democracy and democratization process, discussing the successes and limitations

since its first election in 1966.

, Botswana’s Political Stability and Electoral Dominance

The cornerstone of Botswana’s political system is its regular, peaceful elections, which

are generally viewed as free and fair. Since its first election in 1966, Botswana has

conducted multiparty elections every five years without significant disruptions. The

Botswana Democratic Party’s consistent victory can largely be attributed to a

combination of effective governance, the successful management of economic

resources (particularly diamonds), and the personal appeal of its leadership figures
such as Sir Seretse Khama, Festus Mogae, and Ian Khama. As a result, Botswana has
avoided the fate of many African nations that have experienced military coups, violent

political transitions, or authoritarian one-party rule.



Nonetheless, this long-term dominance by the BDP raises questions about the depth of

Botswana's democratic credentials. While the elections have been technically

competitive, the political playing field has been heavily skewed in favour of the ruling

party. For much of Botswana’s post-independence history, opposition parties have been

fragmented and underfunded, struggling to mount a serious challenge to the BDP's

dominance. Additionally, the first-past-the-post electoral system, similar to that of former

colonial powers like the United Kingdom, has tended to exaggerate the BDP’s

parliamentary majority, further consolidating its power.



Botswana’s Democratic Paradox: Electoral Democracy or Liberal Democracy?

De Jager and Sebudubudu’s (2016) characterization of Botswana as falling within a

democratic ‘grey zone’ reflects the tension between electoral success and the broader
values of liberal democracy. While Botswana meets the criteria for electoral

democracy—regular elections, an independent judiciary, and adherence to the rule of

law—it falls short in other areas that are essential to liberal democratic governance. Key

elements of liberal democracy, such as robust political competition, civil liberties, and

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nancylonake. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R59,33. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R59,33
  • (0)
  Buy now