Exam (elaborations)
HMEMS80_2024_SEMESTER_2_PORTFOLIO OF_EVIDENCE_ANSWER (FULL PAPER)
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
HMEMS80_2024_SEMESTER_2_PORTFOLIO OF_EVIDENCE_ANSWER (FULL PAPER)
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
1 review
By: charlesndlovu95 • 3 weeks ago
good
Content preview
SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024PORTFOLIO OF EVIDENCE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
HMEMS80
Name and Surname: XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
Student number:
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
PART 1
1
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY
I, ___________________XXXXXXX____________________________Full name/s and
surname
Student number: ______________XXXXXXXXXX____________________________
declare that I am the author of this Portfolio of Evidence for HMEMS80. I further declare that the
entire Portfolio of Evidence is my own, original work and that where I used other information
and resources, I did so in a responsible manner. I did not plagiarise in any way and have
referenced and acknowledged any resources that I consulted and used to complete this portfolio
according to the requirements of the APA style of referencing. By signing this declaration, I
acknowledge that I am aware of what plagiarism is, and the consequences thereof.
Furthermore, I acknowledge that I am aware of UNISA’s policy on plagiarism and understand
that if there is evidence of plagiarism within this document, UNISA will take action.
Date: ______10/10/2024_______________________________
Place: _______GAUTENG PROVINCE______________________________
Signature: ______XXXXXX___________________________
(provide an electronic signature or type your name and surname again)
2
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
PART 2
3
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
2.1 Reflection on formative assessment
Reflection on learning in Assignment 01
Write a clear and logical description of:
A. Reflection of my errors
The first assignment is comprised of two separate elements. The opening part of the
research focused on a series of multiple-choice questions, while the following segment
explored a comprehensive review of literature related to the topic of plagiarism. I
achieved a score of 7 out of 10 on the multiple-choice examination. Ms. Nomvuyo
Bekwa made a mistake while assessing the multiple-choice questions. After
meticulously examining my mistakes, I attained a score of 9 out of 10. Following a
comprehensive examination of the lecture feedback, I have meticulously pursued the
answers. I regretfully acknowledge that I made a mistake in my response to question 10
of the multiple-choice section. I inadvertently chose option A rather than the correct
choice, which was B.
Section two was an utter failure. I faced challenges in grasping the assigned tasks, as I
depended exclusively on my individual interpretation to tackle the literature review. I
sincerely regret any mistakes I may have made in conveying relevant and important
information without proper citation. The introduction and background presented for the
topic lack depth, suggesting that further articles are necessary to improve the
coherence and thoroughness of the literature review. The variables were not clearly
defined or specifically identified. Furthermore, I perceived the clarification of my
variables to be inadequate, as it did not provide a thorough grasp of the anticipated
standards and methodologies necessary for executing the literature review. The
definition used was overly broad and did not include the necessary citations or
contextual significance.
4
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
An additional error was noted regarding the incorrect application of the APA referencing
style, particularly in the in-text format. Challenges arose in effectively linking the
problem statement to existing research, as well as in adequately substantiating the
importance of the study. The literature review posed a considerable challenge and
resulted in notable frustration, prompting thoughts of surrender due to my less-than-
satisfactory performance.
B. Feedback
The feedback offered by the lecturer regarding the initial assignment has proven
instrumental in identifying and rectifying my errors. I believe that the introduction
and background provided for the topic are insufficient. I regret to inform you that I
failed to adequately demonstrate my comprehension of the task at hand. I referred
to the learning resources accessible on myUnisa in order to read with
comprehension and ascertain the expected content, rather than relying solely on
my own understanding. I required additional information and conducted further
research on articles pertaining to plagiarism.
The assessment sheet serves as a valuable tool in demonstrating the scoring
criteria for each section, providing a comprehensive reference to ensure thorough
coverage of the discussed topics.0717513144 I have categorised the various
forms of plagiarism into variables, specifically focusing on student attitudes
towards plagiarism and the extent of plagiarism. The previous research required
further refinement, and the reference was not appropriately employed. In the
future, my primary objective will be to enhance my adherence to the appropriate
APA styles in order to minimise the likelihood of repeating similar errors.
Based on the lecturer's feedback, it is evident that further work is required to
establish a connection between the current research question and the existing
body of knowledge. Additionally, the research's value is not adequately
demonstrated. Literature review lack’s structure, exhibiting a lack of coherence
5
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
and development of ideas. The arguments presented are not clearly articulated,
and the material is not adequately integrated. This demonstrated a lack of
comprehension regarding the assignment, as I composed it based on my own
understanding rather than adhering to the prescribed guidelines for completing the
task. I exhibited inadequate time management skills, resulting in subpar
performance. A significant portion of the work was completed hastily, lacking a
comprehensive understanding of the task at hand and the necessary
requirements for the assignment. By actively engaging with peers and tutors,
actively participating in discussion forums, and diligently attending online
sessions, I have been able to enhance my comprehension of the requirements for
this assessment. In the future, I will make a conscious effort to seek clarification
whenever I encounter something I don't understand. I will not hesitate to ask for
assistance in order to gain a better understanding. Additionally, I will dedicate
more effort to the assessment process.
Reflection on learning in Assignment 02
Write a clear and logical description of:
Reflection of assignment 2 errors
Assignment 2 was based on 50 multiple choice questions. Nine of the questions I
answered incorrectly. The questions had a lot of similar options and statements to
choose from and was tricky which resulted my failure to identify those similarities
appropriately.
Incorrect options selected
I incorrectly opted for option B for question 4, while the correct choice was option D.
I incorrectly opted for option C for question 10, while the correct choice was option B.
I incorrectly opted for option D for question 19, while the correct choice was option A.
I incorrectly opted for option B for question 22, while the correct choice was option A
6
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
I incorrectly opted for option B for question 25, while the correct choice was option A.
I incorrectly opted for option D for question 27, while the correct choice was option A.
I incorrectly opted for option C for question 33, while the correct choice was option B.
I incorrectly opted for option B for question 35, while the correct choice was option D.
I incorrectly opted for option B for question 37, while the correct choice was option A.
Challenging questions
The similarity among some of the questions created a challenge in distinguishing the
incorrect options from the correct ones. Consequently, I found myself guessing the right
answer, as I had not allocated sufficient time to revisit the chapter and fully comprehend
the questions presented. I must strive 0717513144for improvement and not overlook
this opportunity. I ought to have been more discerning based on my prior experiences
with multiple-choice questions, paying closer attention to the misleading aspects of the
options and delving deeper into the assigned material to extract the accurate
information.
Feedback received on Assignment 2
For the multiple-choice questions, I got 40 correct from the 50 questions. But there is an
error cause from the quiz navigation I got 9 incorrect which means I got 41 correct from
the 50 questions. The lecture did not provide any feedback where I was incorrect but
only the answer sheet to check the answers.
Challenges on Assignment 2
The multiple-choice questions incorrect options were caused by how tricky the way
questions were asked as they were similar options and statements to choose from and
my failure to identify those similarities appropriately because I was not sure of the
correct option to choose from.
Addressing Assignment 2
7
,SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
There is a huge improvement and hope from assignment 2, I had to study hard and
follow the instructions given on myUnisa learning material to improve my performance.
The grades I got from assignment 1 motivated me to do better for assignment 2 to pass
this module. Reviewing the 9 incorrect responses and the corresponding correct
answers, and aligning them with the prescribed material, made me understand the
mistakes made.
8
, SEM 2 2024 HMEMS80 POE 2024 SEM 2 2024
2.2 Weekly self-evaluations
Include the two qualitative questions as self-reflections here for any three weeks
75of your choice. In addition to including the content that you provided during
the specific weeks, also add a further reflection on how you feel about your
answers at this point in time, now that you look back at these reflections:
Nr Week Self-reflections
1A Insert a copy of your two qualitative self-reflection questions for the chosen
week here
11.Q. Based on this week’s work, which content did you find easy to
understand? What helped you understand the material?
11.A. A literature review is characterized by its high level of technicality,
presenting a challenge in comprehension, particularly for individuals
encountering it for the first time. 0717513144The provided guidelines offer
some assistance, although the volume of information and its manner of
presentation can be overwhelming. Moreover, the interface on MyUnisa lacks
user-friendliness, and takes time to get used to it.
12.Q. What sections did you not understand properly? How do you think we
can improve our presentation and activities around this part of the work for
this module?
12.A. I am currently experiencing obstacles in understanding the entirety of
9
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tatendamuzavazi. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R100,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now