100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Legl 2700 Roessing Test 1 Court Cases Questions And Answers R205,32   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Legl 2700 Roessing Test 1 Court Cases Questions And Answers

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • Institution
  • UGA LEGL 2700

Legl 2700 Roessing Test 1 Court Cases Questions And Answers Exxon Mobil Corp V Allapattah Service class action. The court found that it /could/ consider the claims of class members who did not meet the $75,000 requirement. Batson V Kentucky SC outlawed racial discrimination in jury selection. ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • October 19, 2024
  • 7
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • UGA LEGL 2700
avatar-seller
Legl 2700 Roessing Test 1 Court Cases
Questions And Answers

Exxon Mobil Corp V Allapattah Service class action. The court found that it /could/

consider the claims of class members who did not meet the $75,000 requirement.




Batson V Kentucky SC outlawed racial discrimination in jury selection.




JEB V Alabama Ex Rel. SC banned gender discrimination in jury selection after lawyer

tried to remove male jurors from paternity case.




Equal Protection clause in 14th amendment.




Trump DC Hotel Old Post Office building was bought by Trump and turned into a hotel


Conflict of interests for diplomats staying at hotel to appease Trump

Emoluments Clause: No public official can receive gifts from foreign governments.




Crew v. Trump

New York justice organization tried to sue Trump for violating emoluments clause.

, Legl 2700 Roessing Test 1 Court Cases
Questions And Answers
No standing to sue, so they added local hotel and restaurant owners to the lawsuit

Still thrown out due to lack of standing.




Foster V Chatham All white jury chosen and convicted Foster of murder w/ death penalty.


Prosecutor had marked and circled all the black potential jurors and removed them during jury

selection.

GA said it was not a Batson violation, but Supreme Court said it was a clear Batson violation




Gibbons V Ogden Steamships traveling to and from Manhattan.


Federal government has power over interstate waters.

Commerce clause




Wabash V Illinois Commerce clause


Government can regulate railroads




Wickard V Filburn Law that capped how much wheat a person can grow. SC said it was

fine because of the commerce clause.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UpperClass. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R205,32. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R205,32
  • (0)
  Buy now