Exam (elaborations)

PLS3702 PORTFOLIO 2024

0 purchase

Course
Modern Philosophy (PLS3702)

Institution
University Of South Africa

Book
The Rise of Modern Philosophy

PLS3702 Portfolio Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... SECTION A: BIOMEDICAL ETHICS NOTE: If you have chosen to study Section A: Biomedical...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 30 pages

View example

Uploaded on November 6, 2024
Number of pages 30
Written in 2024/2025
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

pls3702 portfolio semester 2 2024 due 6 november

LIBRARYpro Member since 2 year 7704 documents sold

450

179

164

160

PLS3702
PORTFOLIO SEMESTER 2 2024
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 6 NOVEMBER 2024

, PLS3702

OctoberPortfolio Semester 2 2024

Unique Number:

Due Date: 6 November 2024

Modern Philosophy

SECTION A: BIOMEDICAL ETHICS

Question 1

Are Euthanasia and Abortion Comparable Ethical Issues? An Analysis Through
Deontological, Teleological, and Virtue Ethics

The ethical considerations of abortion and euthanasia remain some of the most divisive
issues in modern biomedical ethics. Both involve decisions related to life and death,
raising complex moral questions. In this essay, I will explore whether euthanasia and
abortion can be seen as comparable ethical issues, using the perspectives of
deontological ethics, teleological ethics, and virtue ethics. By analyzing each framework,
we can gain insight into how these ethical theories address the moral complexities of
ending or permitting the end of life.

Deontological Ethics

Deontological ethics, often associated with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, judges the
morality of actions based on rules or duties rather than on their consequences (Kant,
1785/1993). In this view, actions are intrinsically right or wrong, independent of the
outcomes they produce. According to Kantian ethics, moral actions respect the inherent
dignity of individuals, treating people as ends in themselves and never merely as means
(Kant, 1785/1993).

 Application to Abortion: In a deontological framework, abortion may be viewed
as morally impermissible if it involves taking an innocent life, which would violate

, the moral duty to respect and protect human life (Marquis, 1989). If the fetus is
granted moral status, terminating its life could be seen as treating it as a means
to achieve other ends (e.g., the well-being of the mother). This perspective would
prioritize the principle of duty to life over considerations of personal choice or
circumstances.
 Application to Euthanasia: Similarly, euthanasia—particularly active
euthanasia, where an action is taken to end a person’s life—is often viewed as
morally impermissible under deontological ethics. This approach generally
condemns killing, even when motivated by compassion, as it violates the inherent
duty to preserve life (Velleman, 1992). However, some deontologists distinguish
between active and passive euthanasia, with the latter (allowing someone to die
by withholding treatment) potentially being morally acceptable since it does not
involve direct action to end life (Rachels, 1975).

In deontological ethics, euthanasia and abortion appear comparable as both involve the
deliberate termination of life, challenging the moral duty to preserve life. However,
differences may arise regarding autonomy and perceived moral status, as deontologists
may weigh the fetus and the terminally ill differently.

Teleological Ethics

Teleological ethics, including consequentialism and utilitarianism, assesses the morality
of actions based on their outcomes. The most well-known form, utilitarianism, holds that
an action is right if it maximizes overall well-being or minimizes suffering (Mill,
1863/2001).

 Application to Abortion: From a utilitarian perspective, abortion can be morally
permissible if it results in a greater balance of happiness over suffering. For
example, if carrying the pregnancy to term would lead to significant suffering for
the mother or the child due to financial, health, or emotional factors, abortion
might be ethically acceptable as it prevents future hardship (Singer, 1993). This

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

PLS3702 PORTFOLIO 2024

Document information

Subjects

Connected book

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview