100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LML4807 Assignment 1 (100% COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 R50,88
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LML4807 Assignment 1 (100% COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025

 0 purchase

Banking Law and Usage - LML4807 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... Briefly discuss the following prescribed case: Joint Stock Co Varvarinskoye v A...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • February 21, 2025
  • 8
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (10)
avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro
LML4807
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 2025

UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 2025

, LML4807

Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025



Unique Number:

Due Date: March 2025

Banking Law and Usage

1. Facts of the Case (3 marks):

Joint Stock Company Varvarinskoye (the appellant), based in Kazakhstan, was
developing the Varvarinskoye Project, a mining initiative. They engaged Metallurgical
Design and Management (Pty) Ltd (MDM), a South African company, as the lead
contractor. To ensure timely payments to subcontractors and maintain project
momentum, the appellant and MDM established a specific bank account (account 1313)
with Absa Bank. This account was designated exclusively for funds intended for MDM
and its subcontractors, with Absa Bank fully aware of its purpose. In December 2005,
Absa Bank appropriated approximately R28 million from account 1313 to offset debts
owed by MDM and its associated entities, despite the funds being earmarked solely for
subcontractor payments. The appellant contended that these funds did not belong to
MDM and that Absa Bank's appropriation was unlawful.

2. Issue Before the Court (1 mark):

The primary issue was whether Absa Bank had the legal right to appropriate funds from
account 1313, given that the funds were specifically designated for subcontractor
payments and did not legally belong to MDM.

3. Decision of the Court (3 marks):

The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,88. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71250 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Start selling
R50,88
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added