100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IOS2601 MCQ EXAM PACK 2023 R50,00   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

IOS2601 MCQ EXAM PACK 2023

1 review
 405 views  12 purchases

IOS2601 Latest exam pack questions and answers, perfect for OCTOBER NOVEMBER 2023 exam preparation

Last document update: 1 year ago

Preview 3 out of 832  pages

  • August 10, 2020
  • October 26, 2023
  • 832
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (187)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: thobanimgqwashu • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
VarsityC
IOS2601
EXAM PACK

Solutions, Explanations, workings, and references




+27 81 278 3372

,MAY JUNE
2023
EXAM

, IOS2601 EXAM 2023



1. In R v Mazibuko 1958 (4) SA 353 (A)?
a. The court relied on the common law rule that if there is a difference in
penalties between the date of the crime and the date of the trial, the date of
the trial will be decisive.
b. The appellant relied on the principle that harsher penalty could only have
been imposed in respect of crimes that committed before the amendment
came into effect.
c. The court found that if the penalty provided for in an Act is increased by an
amending Act, the presumption against retrospectivity applies.
d. The appellant appealed against a sentence of life imprisonment imposed for
robbery.



2. In which one of the following instances will the principle that legislation only
applies to the future not apply?
a. When legislation changes procedure.
b. Denies a benefit to an accused.
c. When legislation does not change procedure.
d. When legislation deals with the limitation clause of section 36 of the
constitution.



3. In which case were the techniques for interpretation of statutes identified, with
the exception of comparative interpretation?
a. Sigcau v Sigcau 1941 CPD 334
b. Daniel v Campbell 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC)
c. Fouri v Minister of Home Affairs 2005 (3) SA 429 (SCA)
d. Minister v Land Affairs v Slamdien 1999 (4) BCLR (LCC) 422 para 17

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller VarsityC. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00  12x  sold
  • (1)
  Buy now