Answers
Tutorial Letter 203/0/2020
- Institution
- University Of South Africa (Unisa)
This Tutorial Letter contains SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 3
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
Seller
FollowContent preview
COS4807/203/0/2020Tutorial Letter 203/0/2020
Formal Logic
COS4807
Year module
Department of Computer Science
School of Computing
CONTENTS
Solutions to Assignment 3
university
Define Tomorrow. of south africa
, SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 3
Question 1 (20)
(i) To prove that the formula A = ∃x¬(p(x) → q(x)) → ¬(∃xp(x) → ∀xq(x)) is valid, we must
show that it is true in all interpretations.
Let I be an interpretation in which the antecedent of the formula is true. In other words,
vI (∃x¬(p(x) → q(x))) = T . Then vσI (¬(p(x) → q(x))) = T for some assignment σI (by the
semantics of existential quantification, as stated in Theorem 7.22) and vσI (p(x) → q(x)) = F for
some assignment σI (by the truth values for negation). Then vσI (p(x)) = T and vσI (q(x)) = F
for some assignment σI (by the truth values for implication). But then vI (∃xp(x)) = T and
vI (∀xq(x)) = F (by Theorem 7.22). From this we conclude that vI (∃xp(x) → ∀xq(x)) = F
(by the truth values for for implication) and vI (¬(∃xp(x) → ∀xq(x))) = T (by the truth values
for negation).
We have shown that if the antecedent of the formula is true in I , then the consequent is true
in I . Since I is an arbitrary interpretation, we conclude that the who formula is true in any
interpretation.
(ii) To prove that B = ∃x∃yp(x, y) ↔ ∀x∀y¬p(x, y) is unsatisfiable, we must show that it is false in
all interpretations.
Let I be an arbitrary interpretation of B.
vI (∃x∃yp(x, y)) = T iff vσI (p(x, y)) = T for some assignment σI (by Theorem 7.22)
iff vσI (¬p(x, y)) = F for some assignment σI
(by the truth values for negation)
iff vI (∀x∀y¬p(x, y)) = F (by Theorem 7.22)
Since vI (∃x∃yp(x, y)) = T iff vI (∀x∀y¬p(x, y)) = F , we conclude that vI (∃x∃yp(x, y)) 6=
vI (∀x∀y¬p(x, y)), and thus that vI (∃x∃yp(x, y) ↔ ∀x∀y¬p(x, y)) = F (by the truth values for
equivalence). Since I is an arbitrary interpretation, we conclude that B is unsatisfiable.
Question 2 (10)
(i) Consider the formula A = ∀x(p(x) ↔ ∃y(q(y) ∧ r(x, y))). Under the given interpretation, this
formula states that for all natural numbers x, x is stange iff there is an odd number y such that
x has y distinct divisors.
(ii) To prove that A is falsifiable, we need to specify an interpretation in which it is false. There are
many possibilities. Here are a few:
(a) We can use the interpretation given for part (i), but just change the interpretation of pred-
icate p, say to the relation prime. Under this interprepretation, formula A states that all
prime numbers have an odd number of distinct divisors. This is obviously not true for any
prime number, because every prime number has exactly 2 distinct divisors, namely 1 and
itself.
(b) We can change the interpretation of predicate q, say to the unary relation even. Under
this interprepretation, formula A states that all strange numbers have an even number of
distinct divisors. This is obviously not true, according to the definition of strange numbers.
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller passynsapo75. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R133,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now