100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Modelling Computing Systems Chapter 1 Faron Moller & Georg Struth R58,87   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Modelling Computing Systems Chapter 1 Faron Moller & Georg Struth

 33 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Logic for Computer Science/ Computer Technology Logic Chapter 1. Summary of the book Modelling Computing Systems written by Faron Moller Georg Struth. Summary written in English. Using examples and pictures, the substance and theory are clarified. Given at Utrecht University.

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • No
  • Hoofdstuk 1
  • November 25, 2020
  • 5
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Hoofdstuk 1

A proposition is a statement that may be true or false(not both). Not all these propositions are true,
but they can be all checked to hold or not. Exemple:

- My name is Wouter
- 2+3=5
- 2+3=6
- X+ y=9

Not everything is a proposition. Example: 2+= *34, Don’t you agree that this lecture is amazing?
These are examples of sentences, programs or symbols that are not true or false.

A Deduction or inference is made to infer the truth of the third statement from the truth of the first
two statements. The third statement is referred to as the conclusion of the argument while the first
two statements from which we draw the conclusion are referred to as the premises of the
argument.

Propositional logic studies when such statements are true or false. We can do this by constructing a
derivation(afleiden), showing how a conclusion follows from various assumptions. Example: When
the fire alarm goes off, we must evacuate the classroom. The firealarm goes off. We leave the
classroom. This conclusion is valid.

Example: When the fire alarm goes off, we must evacuate the classroom. The fire alarm does not go
off. Hence we don’t leave the classroom. This conclusion is not valid, No! We could leave the class
for any number of reasons: the class may have ended, the break may have started, or some other
calamity.

These examples illustrates something called logical implication and occurs in natural language in
many different ways:

1. If the fire alarm goes off, then we must leave the classroom.
2. We will leave the classroom, provided the fire alarm goes off.
3. Whenever the fire alarm goes off, we’ll leave the classroom.

We will use variables instead of concrete propositions about fire alarms and class rooms. We’ll use
variables written with a capital letter, such as P and Q, to refer to atomic propositions. These are
propositions(beweringen) that we assume to indivisible, and not built up from smaller pieces using
logical connectives such as implication. While using these atomic propositions, we can formulate
interesting statements. A propositional formula is built as follows:

1. Atomic propositions P, Q, R, etc.
2. True – sometimes written T, 1
3. False - sometimes written F, 0

Or the formula is constructed from smaller pieces. If p and q are propositional formulas, then the
following are also propositional formulas:

1. p ⇒ q, implication (if p then q)
2. p ∧ q, conjunction (p and q)
3. p ∨ q, disjunction (p or q)
4. ¬p, negation (p does not hold)

, We use variables starting with capital letters P to denote atomic propositions; lower case variables,
such as p, refer to (possible non-atomic) propositions. Variables such as p are not propositional
formulas themselves! Instead these are sometimes referred to as metavariables.

Syntax defines the structure of the proposition. Semantics studies the meaning of propositions.

The distinction between syntax and semantics shows up all the time. This text is a fragment of well-
formed C# code:

- int x = 14;
- int y = x + 12;

But this is not:

- xxb =[i'3[hxktz ;O;OIDL



We only can study the meaning (that is the
semantics) of code that has a valid syntax. But
we have no idea what the semantics of the
second example is!

Propositional formulas are defined as follows:

- Atomaire proposities P, Q, R
- True, truth, T, 1
- False, falsity, F, 0
- p ⇒ q, implication (if p then q)
- p ∧ q, conjunction (p an q)
- p ∨ q, disjunction (p or q)
- ¬p, negation (p does not hold)


P Q P => Q
F F T
F T T
T F F
T T T




There is a order for propositional logic (rekenregels):

1. Parentheses(haakjes)
2. Negation ¬
3. Conjunction ∧
4. Disconjunction ∨
5. Implication =>

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luukvaa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R58,87. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


R58,87
  • (0)
  Buy now