CRW 2602 (CRW2602)

QUESTION 1 (a) In the crime of crimen iniuria the infringement need not be serious as a minor infringement of the legally-protected interests is deemed sufficient. This statement is incorrect. The infringement must be serious in the case of the crime of crimen iniuria. See SG 7.2.8. (b) In S v Van Leperen 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC), X was convicted of crimen iniuria for slapping Y, a female manager, on the buttocks and making sexual remarks to her. (c) In the case of criminal defamation, t...

CRW2602 _Criminal_Law_Test_Bank. Question 1 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi). (b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient form of intention. (c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6. You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statements (a) and (c) are correct. Question 2 (a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. (b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. (c) This statement is correct. See ...