Mrl3701 cases - Study guides, Study notes & Summaries

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024 See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a) 1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB) 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several cases of abuses of the sequestration process. Attorne...

See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a) 1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB) 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several cases of abuses of the sequestration process. Attorneys should limit their fees and expenses to those stated in application and trustees may no...

MRL3701 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024. See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a) 1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB) 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several cases of abuses of the sequestration process. Attorne...

MRL3701 Assignment 1 Full Solutions Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 August 2024 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a) 1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB) 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several ca...

MRL3701 Assignment 2 Due 13 April 2024 WINDING UP MEANS - ans -essentially the procedure by which a company's assets are sold, its debts are paid, and any money left over is divided amongst the shareholders according to their rights. WINDING UP OF COMPANIES IS REGULATED BY THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS - ans -1. Section 79 - 81 of the Companies Act 71. Winding up of solvent companies 2. Chapter 14 of the Companies Act. 3. Various provision of the Insolvency Act. MODES OF WIN...

Latest SUMMARY OF THE FOLLOWING INSOLVENCY LAW CASES: 1. Magnum Financial Holdings; 2. Ex parte Henning; 3. Epstein v Epstein; 4. Amod v Kahn; 5. Vorster v Steyn; 6. Estate Wege v Strauss; 7. Pretorius' Trustee; 8. Hendriks NO v Swanepoel; 9. Pretorius NO v Stock Owners' Co-operative; 10. Prinsloo en ’n ander v Van Zyl; 11. Rand Air (Pty) Ltd v Ray Bester Investments, etc.

Latest SUMMARY OF THE FOLLOWING INSOLVENCY LAW CASES: 1. Magnum Financial Holdings; 2. Ex parte Henning; 3. Epstein v Epstein; 4. Amod v Kahn; 5. Vorster v Steyn; 6. Estate Wege v Strauss; 7. Pretorius' Trustee; 8. Hendriks NO v Swanepoel; 9. Pretorius NO v Stock Owners' Co-operative; 10. Prinsloo en ’n ander v Van Zyl; 11. Rand Air (Pty) Ltd v Ray Bester Investments, etc.

MRL3701 EXAM PACK 2022. 1 Contents OCTOBER/ NOVEMBER 2021 ........................................................................................................... 2 Question 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Question 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Question 3 ...........

MRL3701 INSOLVENCY LAW JAN/FEB 2022 EXAM. QUESTION 1 1.1 Epstein v Epstein 1987 (4) SA 606 (C) Legal Question – is “friendly/ cordial sequestration blocked from a temporary sequestration request being granted? Facts – the candidate in an application for temporary sequestration request was the respondent’s mother, whom he owed R6000.00 and to whom he composed a letter advising her of his inability to reimburse her credit, subsequently submitting a demonstration of bankruptcy. The r...

INSOLVENCY LAW_ MRL3701 SUMMARY NOTES WITH QUESTIONS. Study unit 1: Introduction to Insolvency Law Case Law: NB: Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) v Summerly and another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) Meaning of “insolvency” Common meaning – a person is insolvent when he is unable to pay his debts, however, The legal test for insolvency is whether the debtor's liabilities, fairly estimated, exceed his assets, fairly valued. The inability to pay debts Is merely eviden...