100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Property Case Summaries Term 4: 6 Detailed Case Summaries for the Test (8 pages) R120,00   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. Property Law (PVL2002H)

Summary

Summary Property Case Summaries Term 4: 6 Detailed Case Summaries for the Test (8 pages)

1 review
 253 views  16 purchases

- includes the 6 case summaries - very detailed , including the minority and majority judgement - includes information from textbook about each case as well as other external sources - includes: - FNB v Commissioner for SARS; Minister -Mkontwana v Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality -...

[Show more]
Last document update: 2 year ago

Preview 1 out of 8  pages

Document information

  • October 6, 2022
  • October 11, 2022
  • 8
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (18)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: carajacobson29 • 2 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
LawGuru

Reviews received

Content preview

Property Case Summaries
For Test

DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS
ILLEGAL



Arbitrary deprivation of property

FNB v Commissioner for SARS; Minister

Facts:
- law permitted SARS to confiscate property owned by one party to settle a tax debt owed
by another party
- SARS confiscated motor vehicles that belonged to FNB to settle the tax debt of some of
the bank’s debtors
- it did not matter whether the property in question belonged to the customs debtor


Legal Question:
- Is the law that permitted SARS to confiscate property owned by one party to settle a tax
debt owed by another party constitutional?

Outcome:
- law found to be unconstitutional
- there is insufficient reason for the deprivation authorised by section 114. It is accordingly
unconstitutional, and the seizures pursuant to it are unlawful. (paras 108, 109, 132 and
133). There is no justification for section 114 to be found in section 36 of the
Constitution. (para 111).

- Expropriation is the most severe form of deprivation and is treated as a special
subcategory that requires the payment of compensation (para 59)
- clarifies the judicial understanding of the relationship between deprivation and
expropriation of property
- sufficient reason test:
- extent of deprivation
- purpose of deprivation
- nature of property

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LawGuru. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R120,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60434 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R120,00  16x  sold
  • (1)
  Buy now