Summary
Political philosophy summary notes
- Institution
- University Of Cape Town (UCT)
Summary of 31 pages for the course political philopsophy at UCT (Summarised notes)
[Show more]
Content preview
Topic 1: Nation State - Do We Need It?A World State
Nielsen
Argument
● to safeguard human rights & equality
● federal & democratic "cantonal" system
● Mutually beneficial cooperation
● less oppressive than current nation-state system
Counter
● logic of the Enlightenment
● utopian?
● consequentialist argument.
● deontological argument.
● Destructive dilemma
Defence
● People can come to accept world govt voluntarily & in democratic manner
Culture is Important
● Desire to retain nation state not ethnocentric chauvinism - reductive
● Value in doing things differently
● Pictures culture as an aesthetic good - reductive
● Character of state seems western - examples of Yugoslavia, Italy, Germany
● Disdaining partial attachments as sources of moral insight makes cosmopolitanism self defeating as it
ignores its own partial influences & human nature and therefore leads to the very parochialism it decries
● Even if possible seems would violate key Rs - to cultural diversity
Assuming world gov desirable - is it possible?
● Examples of 3 mentioned countries - Yugoslavia’s collapse is telling
● Problem of scale
● What about policy?
● Equality on global level?
● Redistribution globally?
, ● Freedom of movement - opportunities & fairness v straining commitments & infringe rights
● N responds - most people wont emigrate unless desperate - crisis of emigration to europe?
Patriotism to world state
● Need patriotism to be a virtue if redistribution accepted in world state
● Can patriotism transfer to global level?
● Requires thick connection between state & culture
● Dilemma: either so disintegrates would be no loyalty & cause conflict/war OR state would have to impose
mandatory patriotism
Value of state
● N says of instruments value & anarchy preferable - excludes patriotism as virtue?
Might as well choose a world state
● Even if oppressive (civil war or authoritarian) we would still be better off - nuclear threat would be less -
But nuclear threat decreased
● N’s gamble: might as well choose a world state
Might as well choose nation state
Main: Hazony
● World state or federation likely to devolve into an imperial order
● Political authority centralised & in hands of culturally distinct group
● Forced union inevitable in absence of utopian conditions (sufficiently shared political culture)
● Due to scale = cant reproduce gains of transition to nation state & undermines self-determination
● Nation state is positively better not just not worse - fosters competition = innovation & prosperity
● On consequentialist & deontological grounds nationalism is virtuous
● If world state too risky must we stick with status quo with its manifest faults?
Remaining attraction of world state
● The motivation to safeguard & promote equality & HRs.
Kantian alternative
Main: Kant
● Pacific federation / federation of peoples
● Independent nation states under international cosmopolitan constitution
● Not world state of dependent cantons
, ● Argues nations would choose this as would see ‘cosmopolitan right’ is own self-interest - would avoid
general warlike conditions currently at international level
● But again, coercive order & policing dissent - some nations likely will avoid agreements in own interests
● If kant wrong = best we can do is achieve order of nation states who make voluntary agreements but enter
neither world state nor kantian federation as both of these collapse into imperial order & therefore worse
than the status quo
● Wisdom of second best: if humans had very different psychology & cultural histories they could achieve
better but they don’t so we should accept status quo - counsel of imperfection
Cosmopolitanism
● Accepts motivation for world state but rejects it as utopian & possibly dangerous
● Proposes global justice be sought within system of nation states - westphalia system
● Reform system but not overturn or replace
● Two different strands: C about justice v Culture
● C about justice: opposes any view that restricts an adequate conception of justice ; opposed to liberal
theories
● C about culture: opposed to idea that individuals wellbeing depends on membership to cultural group
● Though the differ in content - root idea that we are citizens of world and owe allegiance to humanity
● For justice = norms of justice apply to all
● For culture = individuals can flourish by forging identities from outside cultural sources
● Moral C: fully inclusive non-perspectival impartial and universal approach to distributive justice & gives
all individuals interests equal weight
● Institutional C: advocates for restructuring of global system to bring states under supranational institutions
to fulfil cosmopolitan distribution obligations.
Basic tension
(1) strong intuition everyone matters equally; Call this equal value hypothesis - each person deserves to be treated
with equal concern & respect
(2) nation state system inhibits equal value in several ways
Moderate Cosmopolitanism
● Some preferences for ones own compatriots is justifiable, though within certain limits set by needs of
non-compatriots
● This national preference affirms special responsibilities towards co-nations
● Not dependent on global good - even if it prevents global good, we don't have duty to.
, Extreme Cosmopolitanism
● If each person matters equally then we have no justification for privileging well-being of compatriots
● Such privileging is morally arbitrary & akin to racism
● Nussbaum's Dilemma: must affirm extreme or conationals matter more.
● But according to equal vale hypothesis second horn of dilemma false
What about moderate Cosmopolitanism?
● If we accept extreme we must deny moderate
● Moderate cosmo sounds like common sense - seems an incompatibility between common sense & where
the argument leads us
● So discard common sense? (1) though friendship seen as human good doesn't mean it cant conflict ith
right. (2) less resonant relations with co-nationals than friends.
● So both right & less personally costly not to privilege co-nationals
Moderate Cosmo counter
● Don't have to accept Nussbaum's dilemma or discard common sense
● 2 Main arguments: conceptual & substantive
● Necessary & jointly sufficient
Conceptual
● Unpacks logical features of non instrumental relations
● Godwin - no magic in word my - fact that something is mine doesn't make it more valuable
● Applies to first person plural ‘our’
● Objection = If relation to X is non-instrumental then it entails special duties
● Therefore same applies to co-nationals
● Rests on logic of non-instrumental relations as entailing special responsibilities
● Deflationary argument against conceptual argument
- What if relations to co-nationals are instrumental or friend/co-national comparison is illegitimate
as not nearly as intimate
- Comparison exaggerated?
● Inflationary argument against conceptual argument
- Conceptual argument sound but underestimates its scope
- Not only citizens but people beyond borders in purely non-instrumental relations with us
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jamielouross1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
83100 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now