100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary CONTRACT: Case Summaries for Class Test R80,00   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. Contract Law (PVL3005W)

Summary

Summary CONTRACT: Case Summaries for Class Test
 82 views  2 purchases

these contain summaries of Sweet v Ragerguhara 1978, Singh v McCarthy Retail Ltd 2000, Datacolor International v Intamarket 2001, Culverwell v Brown 1990, Benson v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society 1986, ISEP Structural Engineering v Inland Exploration 1981, Basson v Hanna 2017, BK Tooling v ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 14  pages

Document information

  • September 24, 2023
  • 14
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (6)

Seller

avatar-seller
LawGuru

Reviews received

Content preview

Kaya Borkowski




Contract
Case Summaries

1. Sweet v Ragerguhara 1978
2. Singh v McCarthy Retail Ltd 2000
3. Datacolor International v Intamarket 2001
4. Culverwell v Brown 1990
5. Benson v SA Mutual Life Assurance Society 1986
6. ISEP Structural Engineering v Inland Exploration 1981
7. Basson v Hanna 2017
8. BK Tooling v Scope Precision Engineering 1979
9. Thoroughbred Breeders Association v Price Waterhouse Cooper 2001


Postivie Malperformance

Sweet v Ragerguhara
1978

Relevant for: positive malperformance and mora debitoris

Facts
- Sweet bought a property from Ragerguhara.
- The contract of sale stipulated that "vacant occupation" of the property will be given by a
certain date
- When this date arrived, two families were still unlawfully residing on the property.
- Sweet then sent a letter cancelling the contract
- Ragerguhara denied that Sweet had the right to cancel the contract
- Sweet then sent Ragerguhara a notice of rescission, which Ragerguhara denied was
valid

Issue
- What is the effect of the notice of rescission?
- What type of breach was it?

Outcome
- The breach is positive malperformance
- insufficient evidence had been led by both of the parties to enable the court to decide
whether Ragerguhara's breach was a material breach

- the notice of recission was not legally valid because this was clearly a case of defective
performance (and not mora) and as such, the letter of rescission could not have been




Distribution of this documenet is illegal

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LawGuru. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R80,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79202 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R80,00  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Buy now