100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary CRIMPROC: all semester 1 prescribed cases R110,00
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. Criminal procedure (PBL4802F)

Summary

Summary CRIMPROC: all semester 1 prescribed cases
 18 views  0 purchase

- all prescribed cases - sets out the facts, issue, outcome - cases included: 1. S v Halgryn 2002 2. S v Lusu 2005 3. S v Mugera 2022 4. Ralekwa v Minister of Safety & Security 2004 5. Govender v Minister of Safety & Security 2001 6. Ex Parte Minister of Safety & Security: In re S v Walte...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 35  pages

Document information

  • May 15, 2024
  • 35
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (5)

Seller

avatar-seller
LawGuru

Reviews received

Content preview

Kaya Borkowski


Criminal Procedure Cases
Semester 1

1. S v Halgryn 2002
2. S v Lusu 2005
3. S v Mugera 2022
4. Ralekwa v Minister of Safety & Security 2004
5. Govender v Minister of Safety & Security 2001
6. Ex Parte Minister of Safety & Security: In re S v Walters 2002
7. S v Dlamini; S v Dladla; S v Joubert; S v Schietekat 1999 (headnote)
8. Mathebula v The State 2009 (headnote)
9. S v Van der Merwe 2023
10. S v Grobler 1966 (headnote)
11. S v Benjamin 1980 (headnote)
12. S v Whitehead 2008
13. Dube v The State 2009
14. The President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union
1999 (paras 35 – 49; 63 – 76; 104)
15. S v Khoza 1989 (headnote)
16. S v McIntyre 1997
17. Mudau v S 2013
18. S v Shuping 1983
19. S v Lubaxa 2001
20. S v Mathebula 1997
21. S v Fielies and another 2006
22. S v Zinn 1969
23. S v Malgas 2001
24. S v Dodo 2001 (headnote)
25. S v Tshabalala 2002
26. Shinga v The State & Another: S v O’Connell 2007 (headnote)
27. Mshudulu v Regional Court Magistrate, Kimberley 2023


Table of Cases


Case Key words Upshot

S v Halgryn 2002 - Legal aid lawyer, - the test for poor representation that
accused dissatisfied renders a trial unfair is objective

S v Lusu 2005 - Accused requested - Right to legal representation
postponement to - the presiding officer cannot prevent an
allow him to apply to accused from applying to Legal Aid.
legal aid



Distribution of this document is illegal and constitutes a copy-right violation

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LawGuru. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R110,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R110,00
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added